Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Angry Observer

Community Feedback

Recommended Posts

In this current early access game build there appears to be some issues and non-issues; both of which can have the opinions of the players remain applicable to. It is in my experience that the game remains quite substantial in it's execution and style. The community has designated the anecdotal consequences regarding rather benign securities. If we were to attract a population intended to invigorate the ideologies of the specific play-style, the community indeed could create archetypal characters of intended value within the community and provide 100% positive and agreeable feedback. To seclude the naturalistic and realism aspects of the landscape and architecture we could conceptualize a vastly initial community of unmatched proportions. If we intend to match the game-play value with the time expected to expend we could increase the popularity indefinitely beyond what was originally expected if the community could approve beyond the shadow of a doubt to be intelligent or relatively appreciative. Currently as we regard one another well and invoke the developers to accept positive feedback without guarantee to ironically balance out the inconsistencies that indeed remain, we might investigate differential outcomes of policies and invoke the latter. Beyond the affluent expediencies, we can remain certain that the experimental and early access attributions might increase vaguely into catastrophe of minimal proportions. It is in our best interest as a community to involve the delicate or intrepid experiences to expend or withhold type A figures. All considering, I believe this game has achieved excellence.

Thank you.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just talking in circles all can come down to he's up set with people saying things like "game is dead if we if dev doesnt do "X" thing"

And then people are not positive and they should be according to them blah blah. nothing really important.

  • Haha 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i do not understant, what do you say??

22 hours ago, Angry Observer said:

In this current early access game build there appears to be some issues and non-issues; both of which can have the opinions of the players remain applicable to. It is in my experience that the game remains quite substantial in it's execution and style. The community has designated the anecdotal consequences regarding rather benign securities. If we were to attract a population intended to invigorate the ideologies of the specific play-style, the community indeed could create archetypal characters of intended value within the community and provide 100% positive and agreeable feedback. To seclude the naturalistic and realism aspects of the landscape and architecture we could conceptualize a vastly initial community of unmatched proportions. If we intend to match the game-play value with the time expected to expend we could increase the popularity indefinitely beyond what was originally expected if the community could approve beyond the shadow of a doubt to be intelligent or relatively appreciative. Currently as we regard one another well and invoke the developers to accept positive feedback without guarantee to ironically balance out the inconsistencies that indeed remain, we might investigate differential outcomes of policies and invoke the latter. Beyond the affluent expediencies, we can remain certain that the experimental and early access attributions might increase vaguely into catastrophe of minimal proportions. It is in our best interest as a community to involve the delicate or intrepid experiences to expend or withhold type A figures. All considering, I believe this game has achieved excellence.

Thank you.

r u happy or angry or no?

  • Like 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Adroit and Blithe said:

i do not understant, what do you say??

r u happy or angry or no?

In my gracious attempt to describe the situation with a type of unequaled elegance it appears I have squandered my chances to inform the community of missed opportunities and extended advantages; which may or may not be in reach or even to the understanding of the public. If we were to exile the contemptuous and exalt the righteous, we may find ourselves excitedly delirious beyond comprehension, almost to a degree of a sort of persistent joy or possibly erroneous doubt. To the contrary, if my English were to be my 1st, or even 2nd or 3rd language, then it is a possibility to conceive of a delighted realty of met expectations, however in this realm of existence we may never meet such an opportunity. Exceptions can be made for entities that posses qualities of imaginative opulence. Were we to be intrigued by a fascination of aptitude, we could embrace our faculties with absolute vigor and moralistic behavior. To conclude with the rigorous outcome, I will make my attempted to enthusiastically approach without haste my point known as well. If this community by which I mean the all inclusive sentiment of individuals in said game. to which we each do our part to indicate to one another specific circumstance of non-specified occurrences. We could enhance our inept executive's status of known location to dynamic outcomes.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Angry Observer Do pardon me if i offend you, but could you please just type in your main points that you're trying to say instead of trying to write out a composition and moral of the story? Your long story of feelings and morality is throwing off the main point that you're trying to convey to us readers.

Edited by ranmoru456
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our initial response to acceptance and consecutive emotional status elevation might bring forth a sense of agency and demonstrate conclusive empirical dynastic clauses. To begin an embargo of common responsive tendencies or embellish a type of counsel for the unrepresented. Ubiquitous and decisive promotional actualization may not inhibit our so-called bombastic linguistic contraband. If in entirety we approve, our Community Feedback might excel perfectly if during performance it may increasingly enhance itself to a maximized desirable outcome of an invigorated community with a perceived attitude of excellence geared towards ludicrous behavior. However, cognitive deficiencies may defy any educational deficit and withhold disagreeable and possibly regrettable colliding ideologies. Should we ingratiate ourselves, we may observe a conclusive right to divulge and delude without the tendency to dilute our semi-acceptable behavior, and we may in the end exceed expectations and continue less cautiously for future reference. If any malicious intent is uncovered, it is with all due respect and benevolence that we should realize the ulterior motives were designed for the benefit and of were created with a mindset of good will, if such was contemplated deeply without immediate negative presumption.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...