Does this mean no 64 players in Warzone?

[E - Cleaner 19]

Q: When will the large map game modes come back? - Smok3

A:We believe that Warzone in current scale is close to perfect ...but for your information, you will find larger maps and more players in Recon game mode

 

Somebody to explain this better please. 

[weedtime 649]

First of all 64 is a dumb number - we have 5 member squad's, we want to make it equal for each side so only 30, 40, 50, 60, etc. numbers are valid.

Q: Max playercount per server increased in 0.7 or 0.8 and will warzone large come in 0.7 or 0.8? – Salt Lord
A: We’re aiming to have bigger servers back as soon as possible, but we can’t promise a solid date on that one, there’s just too many variables.

I think they mean by this, the bigger player count will come back when the server optimization and the game allow this. About Bigger maps, I have no idea, but maybe? All depends on servers performance and optimization of the game.

[Polak 188]

No, the person in charge may have misunderstood, wrongly presented, and or missed out on explaining it further.

64 players and large Warzone will return once they improve optimization and/or servers. It is answered on another AMA question, as far as I'm aware, however if not, it is still indicated a lot on Discord. It's been answered at least 10 times just to @Salt Lord alone.

However, as the person who responded also said, Recon will feature larger maps and players on top of that, too.
 

As for warzone, it is a matter of optimization and servers, no date is given.

[E - Cleaner 19]

1 minute ago, weedtime said:

First of all 64 is a dumb number - we have 5 member squad's, we want to make it equal for each side so only 30, 40, 50, 60, etc. numbers are valid.

Q: Max playercount per server increased in 0.7 or 0.8 and will warzone large come in 0.7 or 0.8? – Salt Lord
A: We’re aiming to have bigger servers back as soon as possible, but we can’t promise a solid date on that one, there’s just too many variables.

I think they mean by this, the bigger player count will come back when the server optimization and the game allow this. About Bigger maps, I have no idea, but maybe? All depends on servers performance and optimization of the game.

50-60 am still happy. But no 30. 

Am here for Warzone. 

Thanks.

[mardell 23]

developers need to be smart, new games appear in a row that move 100 characters on the map.

[Salt Lord 109]

Best to wait for offical dev response on the matter 

[Ragir 4,740]

64 is a dumb number, it's never going to be 64

As for the rest, we'll see, it all depends on the CPU performance and how the games play out, 30-40 seems to be the best are for our game on the current maps. 

The real question is, what's with the playercount fetish, are you fighting those 60+ people at once? For now we cannot set it higher because of technical limitations, but once we overcome those, there's still the gameplay hurdle - we've tested bigger playercounts and they felt really chaotic and just like a meatgrind. 

Also, good luck with a tank with 10+ rpgs on the other side

[Manchild 52]

I'd be happy with 40.

[Artaxiad300062 160]

More than 40 would be chaotic on warzone medium. A 20v20 sounds good though, 4 squads of 5 players each is more than enough. 

[Ragir 4,740]

It was 20v20 and I think it will be back to that at least, but for now it's not possible with minimal lag

[mardell 23]

It would be a limited respawn, only HQ, squad leader, and mobile respawa,And making weight system refinement more realistic, it would be less of a chaotic, I think 20V20.

Edited June 11, 2019 by mardell

[Salt Lord 109]

50 player warzone large should be fine if possible. Not having warzone large in the game would be a big mistake to be honest. Not only was is the best and most enjoyable versions of the current maps but it also showed of ww3 at it's prime. so i hope you guys don't give up on it. Would be a huge missed oppertunity if you did 

 

13 minutes ago, Salt Lord said:

50 players is good for warzone large 

 

Edited June 11, 2019 by Salt Lord

[nubbits 206]

Personally I'd like 60 for Warzone large. The large size made the game feel like there were multiple fronts occurring at once which made it a lot more entertaining and felt like a coordinated battle rather than a meatgrind

[PartTimeAHole 42]

Yeah, 40-50 players would be better. Because right now, people tend to outflank each other and take uncontested points all the time. The match is basically a circle right now, where both teams are on different sides of the map and traverse it clockwise.

[mrocznydrwal 51]

Warzone Large is one of reasons why I bought this game. 40-60 people on map will make a real world war feeling, so I'm waiting for it

[tynblpb 683]

10.06.2019 в 22:06, Ragir сказал:

64 is a dumb number, it's never going to be 64

Farewell Ragir. I will miss u...

Скрытый текст